<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CAJE 32</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caje32.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caje32.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The Coalition for the Advancement of Jewish Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:38:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Note from Jeff: A True Confession by Debby Kinman-Ford</title>
		<link>http://caje32.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/a-note-from-jeff-a-true-confession/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Debby Kinman-Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caje32.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/a-note-from-jeff-a-true-confession/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I know that congregations vary so much depending on size, region and so on that taking on these conversations is exciting and exhausting.  Our religious school has reinvented themselves to a more practical, hands-on experiential approach and is seeing  increased enrollment and attendance.  I know at the day school level where I am involved, we are constantly looking at the community continum of services to reach all levels of observance and life cycle.  A daunting task for sure.  I know that unless it is once a year at a conference, professionals are not talking on a regular basis about their worlds.  If we can get together with local collegues once a month for lunch to vent, exchange ideas and so on, why can&#039;t we make that happen nationally...monthly blog topic, conference call etc.

Lastly I know that Jewish educators are amazing and tireless people who are more interested in &#039;making it happen than finding reasons for it not to happen.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that congregations vary so much depending on size, region and so on that taking on these conversations is exciting and exhausting.  Our religious school has reinvented themselves to a more practical, hands-on experiential approach and is seeing  increased enrollment and attendance.  I know at the day school level where I am involved, we are constantly looking at the community continum of services to reach all levels of observance and life cycle.  A daunting task for sure.  I know that unless it is once a year at a conference, professionals are not talking on a regular basis about their worlds.  If we can get together with local collegues once a month for lunch to vent, exchange ideas and so on, why can&#8217;t we make that happen nationally&#8230;monthly blog topic, conference call etc.</p>
<p>Lastly I know that Jewish educators are amazing and tireless people who are more interested in &#8216;making it happen than finding reasons for it not to happen.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do YOU think? by Richard D. Solomon, Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://caje32.wordpress.com/2007/12/25/what-do-you-think/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard D. Solomon, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caje32.wordpress.com/2007/12/25/what-do-you-think/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Dear Jeff,

Thank you for your confession of successfully completing a congregational school and then graduating from a community Hebrew high school in Pittsburgh. 

The importance of a strong Jewish education via a congregational, supplemental or day school cannot be overstated. Toward that end, Elaine Solomon, Hana Bor and I recently wrote an article in which we describe a new career development ladder for Jewish educators beginning with madrichim working in supplemental or day schools and ending with expert teachers who train mentors to coach and help develop pre-service and in-service Jewish teachers. 

If you’re interested in exploring the idea of a  career ladder for Jewish educators, click on to these websites: 

http://caje32.wikispaces.com/JEN+Article+Solomon+Solomon+Bar  or 

http://lookstein.org/lookjed/read.php?1,16568,16568#msg-16568

Thank you Jeff,

Richard D. Solomon, Ph.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jeff,</p>
<p>Thank you for your confession of successfully completing a congregational school and then graduating from a community Hebrew high school in Pittsburgh. </p>
<p>The importance of a strong Jewish education via a congregational, supplemental or day school cannot be overstated. Toward that end, Elaine Solomon, Hana Bor and I recently wrote an article in which we describe a new career development ladder for Jewish educators beginning with madrichim working in supplemental or day schools and ending with expert teachers who train mentors to coach and help develop pre-service and in-service Jewish teachers. </p>
<p>If you’re interested in exploring the idea of a  career ladder for Jewish educators, click on to these websites: </p>
<p><a href="http://caje32.wikispaces.com/JEN+Article+Solomon+Solomon+Bar" rel="nofollow">http://caje32.wikispaces.com/JEN+Article+Solomon+Solomon+Bar</a>  or </p>
<p><a href="http://lookstein.org/lookjed/read.php?1,16568,16568#msg-16568" rel="nofollow">http://lookstein.org/lookjed/read.php?1,16568,16568#msg-16568</a></p>
<p>Thank you Jeff,</p>
<p>Richard D. Solomon, Ph.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Note from Jeff: A True Confession by Andra Rose</title>
		<link>http://caje32.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/a-note-from-jeff-a-true-confession/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Andra Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caje32.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/a-note-from-jeff-a-true-confession/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I know and want to know all the same things.  A task force in my congregation has been reading and talking and envisioning for the past year.  One key component to success (by which I mean kids are relatively happy community members, can see their own progress, and parents are taking their own steps deeper into Jewish) that we&#039;ve identified is excellent teachers who stay and build a program together.  Most of our teachers are college students who come and go, both the fabulous and the mediocre move on after a year or two, or if we&#039;re really lucky, three.  So the model of hiring full-time staff to draw high caliber, stable teachers is appealing.  To do that, the classes have to meet on different days and the teachers have to teach multiple levels and take on some combination of other roles like teen advisors or family educators or camp directors or early childhood teaching.  Where can we find people prepared for, or willing to learn how to do, all that?

Another model that appeals to me is a week or two of summer camp and then Shabbat programming and independent Hebrew learning.  Get the whole family involved.  I&#039;ve heard of two congregations doing something like this.  But we&#039;d need to know a lot about the implementation, reception, and results of this model before making such a big change.  

Then there&#039;s the after school program model, providing a homey program for families who need a place for the kids until they finish their work day.  The kids settle into a relaxed routine, have electives, Hebrew, hang out time, do a little homework, get a little excercise.  Works well in a metropolitan area, but we&#039;re in a small community with lots of after school activities to compete with.  Can it work in this environment?

We&#039;ve been looking at the a la carte model too.  Families would create a &quot;covenant&quot; including what each member will do to further their Jewish learning and/or observance.  That could work in a diverse community like ours (we&#039;re the only shul in town besides Chabad).  What we need to know about this model is how to put together a lot of choices of electives and Shabbat activities, for all ages and levels of observance without going broke.  And we also need to figure out how we can maintain community when everyone is doing different activities, age cohorts aren&#039;t together regularly, etc.  

Anyone out there with experience with any of these models, please contact me.

Andra Rose
ar@andrarose.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know and want to know all the same things.  A task force in my congregation has been reading and talking and envisioning for the past year.  One key component to success (by which I mean kids are relatively happy community members, can see their own progress, and parents are taking their own steps deeper into Jewish) that we&#8217;ve identified is excellent teachers who stay and build a program together.  Most of our teachers are college students who come and go, both the fabulous and the mediocre move on after a year or two, or if we&#8217;re really lucky, three.  So the model of hiring full-time staff to draw high caliber, stable teachers is appealing.  To do that, the classes have to meet on different days and the teachers have to teach multiple levels and take on some combination of other roles like teen advisors or family educators or camp directors or early childhood teaching.  Where can we find people prepared for, or willing to learn how to do, all that?</p>
<p>Another model that appeals to me is a week or two of summer camp and then Shabbat programming and independent Hebrew learning.  Get the whole family involved.  I&#8217;ve heard of two congregations doing something like this.  But we&#8217;d need to know a lot about the implementation, reception, and results of this model before making such a big change.  </p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the after school program model, providing a homey program for families who need a place for the kids until they finish their work day.  The kids settle into a relaxed routine, have electives, Hebrew, hang out time, do a little homework, get a little excercise.  Works well in a metropolitan area, but we&#8217;re in a small community with lots of after school activities to compete with.  Can it work in this environment?</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been looking at the a la carte model too.  Families would create a &#8220;covenant&#8221; including what each member will do to further their Jewish learning and/or observance.  That could work in a diverse community like ours (we&#8217;re the only shul in town besides Chabad).  What we need to know about this model is how to put together a lot of choices of electives and Shabbat activities, for all ages and levels of observance without going broke.  And we also need to figure out how we can maintain community when everyone is doing different activities, age cohorts aren&#8217;t together regularly, etc.  </p>
<p>Anyone out there with experience with any of these models, please contact me.</p>
<p>Andra Rose<br />
<a href="mailto:ar@andrarose.com">ar@andrarose.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Note from Jeff: A True Confession by Jill Wildenberg</title>
		<link>http://caje32.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/a-note-from-jeff-a-true-confession/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Wildenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caje32.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/a-note-from-jeff-a-true-confession/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>We are struggling with the development of a curriculum that has meaning and is values-based.  It is more important to us that the students make associations between what they read in the TaNaKh and their everyday lives than the ability to recite facts without understanding.  We would like them to be able to &quot;relate&quot; to their Jewish history and culture.  A dilemma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are struggling with the development of a curriculum that has meaning and is values-based.  It is more important to us that the students make associations between what they read in the TaNaKh and their everyday lives than the ability to recite facts without understanding.  We would like them to be able to &#8220;relate&#8221; to their Jewish history and culture.  A dilemma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NOTES FROM THE CHAIR &#8211; PETER #3 by iristhepres</title>
		<link>http://caje32.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/notes-from-the-chair-peter-3/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>iristhepres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caje32.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/notes-from-the-chair-peter-3/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>So Peter,

With all due respect, I am not at all sure that our students are different in the 21st century. They have always had different learning styles and interests, I think. What IS different is that now they also have far more choices and far more competing for their attention than in any generation prior. Both students and parents expect to be immediately engaged and gratificatfied or they move on to something else. 

So, I would contend that we need to appraoch engagement of our students differently because if we don&#039;t we won&#039;t have students to engage. Whereas in past generations they stayed and more or less did what we asked and participated to the best of their ability in whatever approaches we offered, today they will only choose to engage and remain our students if we succeed in the effort to engage, not just teach.

Should we have been doing this all along; should teaching always meet the needs and styles of the learners; should it always be relevant so that it is meaning-filled for the participants.. of course. But now, we must.. in order to keep our students and ensure a vbrant and relavant Jewish community for the future.

Iris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Peter,</p>
<p>With all due respect, I am not at all sure that our students are different in the 21st century. They have always had different learning styles and interests, I think. What IS different is that now they also have far more choices and far more competing for their attention than in any generation prior. Both students and parents expect to be immediately engaged and gratificatfied or they move on to something else. </p>
<p>So, I would contend that we need to appraoch engagement of our students differently because if we don&#8217;t we won&#8217;t have students to engage. Whereas in past generations they stayed and more or less did what we asked and participated to the best of their ability in whatever approaches we offered, today they will only choose to engage and remain our students if we succeed in the effort to engage, not just teach.</p>
<p>Should we have been doing this all along; should teaching always meet the needs and styles of the learners; should it always be relevant so that it is meaning-filled for the participants.. of course. But now, we must.. in order to keep our students and ensure a vbrant and relavant Jewish community for the future.</p>
<p>Iris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Notes from the Conference Chair &#8211; Peter #1 by givingarts</title>
		<link>http://caje32.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/notes-from-the-conference-chair-peter-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>givingarts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caje32.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/notes-from-the-conference-chair-peter-1/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s exciting to see the CAJE 32 blog and all of the efforts to create an open space for sharing and learning. I look forward to seeing you and all of the participants in St. Louis.

Michele Lifshen Reing
EXPO: Booth 48
PRESENTER: A Collaborative Creative Arts Approach to Teaching Social Action and Tikkun Olam. Wednesday, 2-3:15PM
INSTIGATOR: CAJE 32 Tzedaka Challenge for Darfur (see blog)
BLOG: http://givingarts.wordpress.com
WEBSITE: http://www.judaicakitcompany.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s exciting to see the CAJE 32 blog and all of the efforts to create an open space for sharing and learning. I look forward to seeing you and all of the participants in St. Louis.</p>
<p>Michele Lifshen Reing<br />
EXPO: Booth 48<br />
PRESENTER: A Collaborative Creative Arts Approach to Teaching Social Action and Tikkun Olam. Wednesday, 2-3:15PM<br />
INSTIGATOR: CAJE 32 Tzedaka Challenge for Darfur (see blog)<br />
BLOG: <a href="http://givingarts.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://givingarts.wordpress.com</a><br />
WEBSITE: <a href="http://www.judaicakitcompany.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.judaicakitcompany.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
